nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interesting new dns failures
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:50:48 +0530
On 5/24/07, Per Heldal <heldal () eml cc> wrote:
It should be the registries responsibility to keep their registrars in line. If they fail to do so their delegation should be transferred elsewhere. Of course, to impose decent rules you'd need a root-operator whose
Moving right back to where we started off .. the core, or at least operation of the core :) This is something that can't be solved at the edge. Unfortunately. srs
Current thread:
- Re: Interesting new dns failures, (continued)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Douglas Otis (May 23)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Kradorex Xeron (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Steve Atkins (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Per Heldal (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures John LaCour (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Hank Nussbacher (May 23)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Mark Andrews (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 21)