nanog mailing list archives

Re: Interesting new dns failures


From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 03:14:47 GMT


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- John Levine <johnl () iecc com> wrote:

Anyone been following the Registerfly fiasco?  Since 2000, the ICANN
registrar agreement has required registrars to escrow their registrant
data according to ICANN's specs.  It's been seven years, ICANN is just
now sending out an RFP to set up escrow providers, only because
they've been shamed into it when people discovered that there were no
backups of Registerfly's registrant data.

Yes, it is a pretty sad commentary on ICANN's ability to
follow through on policy.

Even if ICANN should try to do this, registrars will push back like
crazy since most of them have a minimum price mininum service business
model.  In retrospect, it was a huge mistake to drop the price and let
Verisign and their friends mass merchandise domains as a fashion
accessory, but it's much too late to put that genie back in the
bottle.


Well, that's a pretty sober commentary unto itself.

I ask you: What would you suggest? It's quite hard to craft
technical solutions to policy failures.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.1 (Build 1012)

wj8DBQFGVlSiq1pz9mNUZTMRAgTkAKCEw1bovM6kP9BNA+iRlMj54dNaQgCfZXUa
twkU7qcLFASkvC1GKoQFFjo=
=7/bs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


Current thread: