nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Advertisements
From: bmanning () karoshi com
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 12:37:52 +0000
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:45:38AM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Donald Stahl wrote:What is the smallest IPv6 advertisement that organizations are going to honour- are we still looking at a minimum of a /48?Anything more specific than /32 is going to be filtered at some portion of the ISPs whether for the good or bad. There are some subsets of the v6 address space that have a higher chance of /48 working (for some definition of 'working') than other parts of the address space, though.
perhaps you might better phrase this as; " Anything more specific than a /3 is going to be filtered at some portion of the ISPS whether for the good or bad." just because you have a prefix of (any) size, does not assure that everyone will route it. --bill
Current thread:
- IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 28)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Pekka Savola (May 28)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements bmanning (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements William F. Maton Sotomayor (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Pekka Savola (May 28)