nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet () consulintel es>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:50:59 +0200
This is useless. Users need to use the same name for both IPv4 and IPv6, they should not notice it. And if there are issues (my experience is not that one), we need to know them ASAP. Any transition means some pain, but as sooner as we start, sooner we can sort it out, if required. Regards, Jordi
De: Donald Stahl <don () calis blacksun org> Responder a: <owner-nanog () merit edu> Fecha: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:21:49 -0400 (EDT) Para: John Curran <jcurran () istaff org> CC: <nanog () nanog org> Asunto: Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedAt this point, ISP's should make solid plans for supplying customers with both IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity, even if the IPv6 connectivity is solely for their web servers and mail gateway. The priority is not getting customers to use IPv6, it's getting their public-facing servers IPv6 reachable in addition to IPv4.Exactly. So many people seem to be obsessed with getting the end users connected via IPv6 but there is no point in doing so until the content is reachable. The built in tunneling in Windows could be a problem so let's start by using different dns names for IPv6 enabled servers- mail.ipv6.yahoo.com or whatever. Can anyone think of a reason that a separate hostname for IPv6 services might cause problems or otherwise impact normal IPv4 users? -Don
********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Manolo Hernandez (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Alexander Harrowell (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Andy Davidson (May 31)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (May 31)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 29)
- using v6 specific names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Edward Lewis (May 29)
- IPv6 services trial michael.dillon (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Leo Vegoda (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (May 29)