nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Advertisements
From: Donald Stahl <don () calis blacksun org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:36:44 -0400 (EDT)
I understand now that you were referring strictly to filter limits- I misinterpreted you original post. My apologies.Don't give people an excuse to deagg their /32RIPE may only give out /32's but ARIN gives out /48's so there wouldn't be any deaggregation in that case.That's not what I said. If /48 are accepted by * then people with a /32 or whatever will deagg to /48.
Obviously you don't need to accept /48's from anywhere- you can restrict it to the PI pool- then /32's don't deaggregate but networks approved by ARIN or RIPE or whomever still work.
If we start giving out /32's to work around filters I'm not sure that solves any problems :) And if no one is going to honor a /48 then why bother to give them out?You get one shot at fixed prefix size filters, miss and you'll pay forever. Which is more scarce, /32's or routing table entries.
-Don
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jared Mauch (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Brandon Butterworth (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Leo Vegoda (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements bmanning (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Joel Jaeggli (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Owen DeLong (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jeff Kell (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)