nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Advertisements
From: Donald Stahl <don () calis blacksun org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 21:28:45 -0400 (EDT)
This assumes a single machine scanning, not a botnet of 1000 or even the 1.5m the dutch gov't collected 2 yrs ago.Again, a sane discussion is in order. Scanning isn't AS EASY, but it certainly is still feasible,
With 1.5 million hosts it will only take 3500 years... for a _single_ /64! I'm not sure that's what I would call feasible. -Don
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements William F. Maton Sotomayor (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Dale W. Carder (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- RE: IPv6 Advertisements Barry Greene (bgreene) (May 30)
- RE: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Paul Vixie (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jeroen Massar (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements John Kristoff (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements William F. Maton Sotomayor (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Paul Vixie (May 29)