nanog mailing list archives
RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 08:23:01 -0600
Elmar: Marketing and theory -- I haven't had a chance to test it myself. BTW, I'm not regurgitating Extricom's marketing rhetoric when I say you don't need to worry about channel planning -- their product is designed with that specifically in mind. The technical benefits and caveats of this single-channel architecture, and the possible concerns that a network planner might have around the requirement to have L1 connectivity from Extricom's APs to their switch, are better discussed in another forum. Frank -----Original Message----- From: Elmar K. Bins [mailto:elmi () 4ever de] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 7:46 AM To: Frank Bulk Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] frnkblk () iname com (Frank Bulk) wrote:
If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel
planning
beyond adding more "channel blankets".
Is that based on marketing, theory (based on the whitepapers and patent descriptions) or practical experience? Elmar.
Current thread:
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs, (continued)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Lamar Owen (Nov 09)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 09)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Adrian Chadd (Nov 09)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Joel Jaeggli (Nov 10)
- RE: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Frank Bulk (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Joel Jaeggli (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Carl Karsten (Nov 12)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Elmar K. Bins (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Niels Bakker (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Jeff Kell (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Casey Callendrello (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 09)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Lamar Owen (Nov 09)
- RE: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Church, Charles (Nov 09)