nanog mailing list archives
Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net
From: "S. Ryan" <auser () mind net>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:51:15 -0800
Or it was a minor oversight and you're all pissing and moaning over nothing? That's a thought too. Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wroteth on 11/20/2007 11:42 AM:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:21:19 PST, goemon () anime net said:This seems a rather unwise policy on behalf of cox.net -- their customers can originate scam emails, but cox.net abuse desk apparently does not care to hear about it.Seems to be perfectly wise if you're a business and care more about making money than getting all tangled up in pesky things like morals and ethics. It's great when you can help the balance sheet by converting "ongoing support costs" and "loss of paying customers" into what economists call "externalities" (in other words, they make the decisions, but somebody else gets to actually pay for the choices made).
Current thread:
- unwise filtering policy from cox.net goemon (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net S. Ryan (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Jeff Shultz (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Joe Greco (Nov 20)
- [admin] Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Alex Pilosov (Nov 20)
- Re: [admin] Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Martin Hannigan (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net S. Ryan (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Martin Hannigan (Nov 20)
- RE: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Raymond L. Corbin (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Chris Owen (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net chuck goolsbee (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 20)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Sean Donelan (Nov 20)