nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again...
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews () isc org>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 12:21:10 +1100 (EST)
In article <200711051726.lA5HQpft019903 () larry centergate com> you write:
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:52:11 -0500 (EST) Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote:I just wish the IETF would acknowledge this and go ahead and define a DNS bit for artificial DNS answers for all these "address correction" and "domain parking" and "domain tasting" people to use for their keen "Web 2.0" ideas.Yes, let's let the IETF go off for 7 years to debate and try to put into an RFC something else that won't actually be used. Sorry Sean, you've lost me on this one. :-) John
You already have the bits for SE (and other signed infrastructure zones) that allow you to detect when this sort of garbage is pulled. All you have to do is deploy a DNSSEC aware resolver. Mark
Current thread:
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again..., (continued)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Andrew Sullivan (Nov 05)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Sean Donelan (Nov 04)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 04)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Eliot Lear (Nov 04)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Sean Donelan (Nov 04)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Eliot Lear (Nov 04)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Joe Greco (Nov 05)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 05)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Florian Weimer (Nov 04)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... John Kristoff (Nov 05)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Mark Andrews (Nov 05)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Steve Atkins (Nov 06)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Martin Hannigan (Nov 06)