nanog mailing list archives

Re: How Not to Multihome


From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:49:53 -0700


Keegan.Holley () sungard com wrote:

I'm really interested to see what happens when we start filling those
same routers with ipv6 routes.

All 970 of them?

joelja



*Randy Bush <randy () psg com>*
Sent by: owner-nanog () merit edu

10/08/2007 06:10 PM

      
To
      "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
cc
      nanog <nanog () merit edu>
Subject
      Re: How Not to Multihome


      






It's not 'law' per se, but having the customer originate their own
announcements is definitely the Right Way to go.

it is interesting, and worrysome, to consider this in light of likely
growth in the routing table (ref ipv4 free pool run out discussion) and
vendors' inability to handle large ribs and fibs on enterprise class
routers.

randy





Current thread: