nanog mailing list archives
Re: 240/4
From: Alain Durand <alain_durand () cable comcast com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:11:00 -0600
On 10/18/07 12:53 PM, "Jon Lewis" <jlewis () lewis org> wrote:
I could see bits of 240/4 perhaps being of use to large cable companies for whom there just isn't enough 1918 space to address all their CPE gear...and/or they really want unique addressing so that if/when networks merge IP conflicts are avoided.
I do work for one of those "large cable companies" and no, 240/4 is not useable for us either for the exact same reasons that you pointed out to explain why 240/4 will not work in public space: there are just too many devices that can't easily be upgraded. - Alain.
Current thread:
- Re: 240/4, (continued)
- Re: 240/4 James R. Cutler (Oct 18)
- Re: 240/4 Joe Greco (Oct 18)
- RE: 240/4 michael.dillon (Oct 18)
- RE: 240/4 michael.dillon (Oct 18)
- RE: 240/4 michael.dillon (Oct 18)
- RE: 240/4 (MLC NOTE) Alex Pilosov (Oct 18)
- Re: 240/4 (MLC NOTE) S. Ryan (Oct 19)
- Re: 240/4 Joe Greco (Oct 18)