nanog mailing list archives
Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance?
From: "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:23:01 -0400
On 10/29/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET <ml () t-b-o-h net> wrote:
On 10/29/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET <ml () t-b-o-h net> wrote:"Unfortunately, we cannot provide you with specific information other than to suggest a review of the questionnaire we supplied and try to determine where your mailing practices may be improved upon."In other words, fix your forwarding a lot better (and possibly segregate it from your main mail stream, clearly label the forwarding IP as a forwarder, etc) Yahoo arent really in the business of teaching people how to do a better job. If that sounds like arrogance .. srs"Fix your forwarding a lot better". Not sure what this means. My machines are MX's for the clients domain.
What are the addresses of the machines? -M<
Current thread:
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance?, (continued)
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Joe Greco (Oct 30)
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? chuck goolsbee (Oct 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Al Iverson (Oct 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Daniel Senie (Oct 30)
- Message not available
- Re: mail operators list Al Iverson (Oct 30)
- Re: mail operators list Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 30)
- Re: mail operators list Alex Pilosov (Oct 30)
- Re: mail operators list Martin Hannigan (Oct 31)
- Message not available
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Martin Hannigan (Oct 30)
- BellSouth.net Mail Operator? (was:Re: Any help for Yahoo!...) chuck goolsbee (Oct 30)
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Martin Hannigan (Oct 29)
- Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance? Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET (Oct 30)