nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 22:05:40 +0800
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007, Jared Mauch wrote:
I do not agree the filters as originally proposed are "too aggressive". Traffic engineering with one's peers is all very well and good, but at the second AS (or overseas) it's not acceptable.I think this is the most important point so far. There are a lot of providers that think that their announcements need to be global to manage link/load balancing with their peers/upstreams. Proper use of no-export (or similar) on the more specifics and the aggregate being sent out will reduce the global noise significantly. Perhaps some of the providers to these networks will nudge them a bit more to use proper techniques.
Maybe some publicly documented case studies would be nice? Or is that all just too "topic secret" to tell your competitors how to do? That said, my second-to-last employer wouldn't actually handle BGP communities that they documented they'd accept.. with that kind of consistency are you surprised that the slightly-less-than-"nanog"-cluey-netadmins crowd of network administrators don't bother with BGP juju and stick to what works? Adrian (And no, they still don't accept the communities they document they would; nor tag traffic with DSCP bits they documented they would. Fun times.)
Current thread:
- Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 07)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 07)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Leo Bicknell (Sep 07)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 07)
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Lincoln Dale (Sep 07)
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 08)
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Lincoln Dale (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 07)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter William Allen Simpson (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jared Mauch (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Adrian Chadd (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Joe Provo (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Stephen Sprunk (Sep 10)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter bmanning (Sep 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Bradley Urberg Carlson (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Forrest (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Russ White (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Forrest (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Andrew - Supernews (Sep 08)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Russ White (Sep 08)