nanog mailing list archives

Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 )

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:37:50 -1000

The model isn't very new at all.


no it isn't.  many of us remember atm-1, so atm-2 is no big surprise.

randy

Current thread:

NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Durand, Alain (Sep 28)
- RE: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) michael.dillon (Sep 28)
  - Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Alain Durand (Sep 28)
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Mark Smith (Sep 29)
  - Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Randy Bush (Sep 29)
    - Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Mark Smith (Sep 29)
    - Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Mark Smith (Sep 29)
    - Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Randy Bush (Sep 29)
    - Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Mark Smith (Sep 29)
    - Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Per Heldal (Sep 30)
    - Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 ) Mark Smith (Sep 30)