nanog mailing list archives

RE: Problems sending mail from .mumble


From: "Fred Reimer" <freimer () ctiusa com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:34:29 -0400

This wouldn't be a problem if people would use, and applications would
enforce the use of, proper URL's instead of domain names for web
destinations.  The proper URL for a file is file://... IIRC.  For a web page
it is http://...  I understand people are lazy, including me, but the web
browsers can pre-type in http:// whenever you click on the address bar to
make it easier.  For CLI-type applications, well, you're using a CLI so
you're supposedly smart enough to figure it out.

Fred Reimer, CISSP, CCNP, CQS-VPN, CQS-ISS
Senior Network Engineer
Coleman Technologies, Inc.
954-298-1697


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of
Robert Bonomi
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 12:56 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Problems sending mail from .mumble



Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Duane Wessels <wessels () packet-pushers com>
Subject: Re: Problems sending mail from .mumble

FWIW I was able to find one application, the text browser 'links,'
which accepts either filename or hostnames as its commandline
argument.  From what I can tell its algorithm is something like
this:

    - if tld/extension has two letters --> URL
    - if less than two letters --> File
    - if tld/extension is in list of known gTLDs --> URL
    - else --> File


The web browser "Lynx" does something very similar.  One addendum to
the
above logic is that if the DNS look-up fails, it tries to use the
string
as a local file path.

Typo the FQDN in a URL to something that returns NXDOMAIN, and you get
an
error message to the effect that lynx 'couldn't access start *FILE*
"foo'"
(emphasis added.)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description:


Current thread: