nanog mailing list archives

Re: [Nanog] Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics [Was: Re: ATT VP: Internet to hit capacity by 2010]


From: Mark Smith <nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:43:24 +0930

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:55:58 +0100
<michael.dillon () bt com> wrote:

 
Time to push multicast as transport for bittorrent? 

Bittorrent clients are already multicast, only they do it in a crude way
that does not match network topology as well as it could. Moving to use
IP multicast raises a whole host of technical issues such as lack of
multicast peering. Solving those technical issues requires ISP
cooperation, i.e. to support global multicast.

But there is another way. That is for software developers to build a
modified client that depends on a topology guru for information on the
network topology.

<snip>

Isn't TCP already measuring throughput and latency of the network for
RTO etc.? Why not expose those parameters for peers to the local P2P
software, and then have it select the closest peers with either the
lowest latency, the highest throughput, or a weighed combination of
both? I'd think that would create a lot of locality in the traffic.

Regards,
Mark.

-- 

        "Sheep are slow and tasty, and therefore must remain constantly
         alert."
                                   - Bruce Schneier, "Beyond Fear"

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG () nanog org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog


Current thread: