nanog mailing list archives
RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6
From: Sean Siler <Sean.Siler () microsoft com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:02:30 -0700
Yep - absolutely. I was referring to built-in support from the stack. Dibbler is the primary third party provider we have seen for DHCPv6 support on downlevel clients. Sean -----Original Message----- From: Charles Wyble [mailto:charles () thewybles com] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 2:55 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Sean Siler wrote:
Nope. XP does not support DHCPv6 - only Vista/Windows Server 2008 (and later) can do that. Sean
http://internecine.eu/systems/windows_xp-ipv6.html and http://internecine.eu/software/dibbler_dhcpv6.html discuss how to deploy dhcpv6 on xp. It's 3rd party but doable.
Current thread:
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6, (continued)
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 TJ (Aug 18)
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Darden, Patrick S. (Aug 19)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 David W. Hankins (Aug 19)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Dale W. Carder (Aug 18)
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 TJ (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Charles Wyble (Aug 18)
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 TJ (Aug 18)
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Sean Siler (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Charles Wyble (Aug 18)
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Sean Siler (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Antonio Querubin (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Kevin Oberman (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Antonio Querubin (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 David W. Hankins (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 David W. Hankins (Aug 18)