nanog mailing list archives

RE: interger to I P address


From: "Matlock, Kenneth L" <MatlockK () exempla org>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 07:46:36 -0600

Huh, learn something new every day!

Well, at least my method shows the underlying theory behind how the
conversion works :)

Thanks!

Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
(303) 467-4671
matlockk () exempla org
-----Original Message-----
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [mailto:iljitsch () muada com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 6:27 AM
To: Matlock, Kenneth L
Cc: Colin Alston; kcc; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: interger to I P address

On 27 aug 2008, at 14:18, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:

Easiest way.

$ ping 1089055123
PING 1089055123 (64.233.169.147): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 64.233.169.147: icmp_seq=0 ttl=242 time=105.418 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.169.147: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=105.891 ms
^C
--- 1089055123 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 105.418/105.655/105.891/0.236 ms

:-)


Current thread: