nanog mailing list archives
Re: interger to I P address
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:08:30 +1200
her at the apnic meeting, we are indulging for a bit into the deep topic of how ot textually represent 32-bit AS numbers. is it xxxx.xxxx or xxxxxxxx? while we readily admit that a deep many year discussion of a dot is clearly a topic for the ietf, we do have to allocate these things, so actually need an answer. on the other hand, i wonder if this ingenious community could come up with the extraodinarily difficult programming task of routines to convert between the two notations. randy
Current thread:
- RE: interger to I P address, (continued)
- RE: interger to I P address Eric Van Tol (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address Aaron Gifford (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address bmanning (Aug 27)
- RE: interger to I P address Joe Blanchard (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address Beat Vontobel (Aug 28)
- RE: interger to I P address Joe Blanchard (Aug 27)
- RE: interger to I P address Boyd, Benjamin R (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address Mike Damm (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address bfeeny (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address Johnny Eriksson (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address Randy Bush (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address Mark Newton (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address Rob Austein (Aug 27)
- interger to I P address chartley (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address Joe Greco (Aug 27)
- RE: interger to I P address Darden, Patrick S. (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address Colin Alston (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address Henry Yen (Aug 27)
- Re: interger to I P address Joe Greco (Aug 27)