nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP Fragmentation
From: "Glen Kent" <glen.kent () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:14:44 +0530
I'm not sure how to address the above points since there appear to be some incorrect assumptions at play. It all depends on whether the Don't Fragment (DF) bit is set in IPv4 and how the source application responds to any resulting ICMP error responses (if the DF is set and one of the routes requires fragmentation).
OK, so what happens if a transit router does not support IP fragmentation and it receives a packet which is bigger than the outgoing link's MTU. Should it simply drop the packet or proactively send an ICMP Dest Unreachable error (Frag required) to the peer? I understand that routers usually must send this error only when a fragmentation is required and they recieve a packet with DF bit set. However, in this case this router would drop the packet (for it doesnt support fragmentation) and sending an ICMP error back to the host, warning it that its packets will get dropped seems to be a better option. OTOH, what do most of the implementations do if they send a regular IP packet and receive an ICMP dest unreachable - Fragmentation reqd message back? Do they fragment this packet and then send it out, or this message is silently ignored? Glen
Current thread:
- IP Fragmentation Glen Kent (Aug 20)
- Re: IP Fragmentation Jim Logajan (Aug 20)
- Re: IP Fragmentation Glen Kent (Aug 28)
- Message not available
- Re: IP Fragmentation Fernando Gont (Aug 28)
- RE: IP Fragmentation Tony Li (Aug 28)
- Re: IP Fragmentation Glen Kent (Aug 28)
- Re: IP Fragmentation Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 29)
- Re: IP Fragmentation Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 29)
- Re: IP Fragmentation Glen Kent (Aug 28)
- Re: IP Fragmentation Jim Logajan (Aug 20)
- Re: IP Fragmentation Jim Shankland (Aug 20)
- Re: IP Fragmentation Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 20)
- Re: IP Fragmentation Sam Stickland (Aug 20)