nanog mailing list archives

Re: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercage, why are we peering with the American RBN?

From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:08:00 +0530

On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:

2. On a different note, why is anyone still accepting their route
announcements? I know some among us re-route RBN traffic to protect users.
Do you see this as a valid solution for your networks?

What ASNs belong to Atrivo, anyway?


The ASNs you ask about - as per the report - are on pages 4..8 of
http://hostexploit.com/downloads/Atrivo%20white%20paper%20082808ac.pdf

Current thread:

Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercage, why are we peering with the American RBN? Gadi Evron (Aug 29)
- Re: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercage, why are we peering with the American RBN? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 29)
- RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercage, why are we peering with the American RBN? Marc Sachs (Aug 29)
  - RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercage, why are we peering with the American RBN? Gadi Evron (Aug 29)
    - Re: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercage, why are we peering with the American RBN? Jim Popovitch (Aug 29)