nanog mailing list archives
Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958
From: Cvetan Ivanov <zezo () spnet net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:08:52 +0200
Hi, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Is there some reason why 65000 is especially problematic ?
65000 and above are private as numbers and should not be seen in the global table.
Cvetan -- Cvetan Ivanov System Administrator SpectrumNet Jsc.
Current thread:
- _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Andy Davidson (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Marshall Eubanks (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Cvetan Ivanov (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Marshall Eubanks (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Joe Abley (Dec 11)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 bill fumerola (Dec 11)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Cvetan Ivanov (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Marshall Eubanks (Dec 10)