nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3 issues
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 08:20:22 -0500
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 11:21:50AM -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
Given the lurking presence of wannabe press vultures here, I doubt you'll see anything forthcoming from the technical folks about what actually happened. This is not to say that people haven't been informed of the issue, it's simply that NANOG is no longer a friendly hapy techie-only place where such information can be shared without it being seized on and quoted without permission by the press.
It was good advice then; it's even better advice now: Never say anything in an electronic message that you wouldn't want appearing, and attributed to you, in tomorrow morning's front-page headline in the New York Times. --- Colonel David Russell, former head of DARPA's Information Processing Techniques Office ---Rsk
Current thread:
- RE: Level 3 issues, (continued)
- RE: Level 3 issues Blake Pfankuch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Derek Bodner (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Blake Pfankuch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Kevin Loch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Steven King (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Matthew Petach (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues virendra rode (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Rich Kulawiec (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Alex H. Ryu (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Blake Pfankuch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Jim Popovitch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Justin M. Streiner (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Todd Vierling (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 29)
- RE: Level 3 issues Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- unsubscribe Springer, Dennis D (Dec 29)
- RE: unsubscribe Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)