nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re: Recommendation of Tools
From: aawolfe () gmail com
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:08:09 +0000
On Dec 3, 2008 1:52am, Pekka Savola <pekkas () netcore fi> wrote:
back from the routers on path. As a result, in almost all cases, the real hop-by-hop latency of actual end-to-end data packets is better than it can report.On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Andrew Mulholland wrote: On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia) kin-wei.lee () hp com> wrote: Hi all, do you have any recommended tools that can measure latency/delay hop by hop basis? Preferable the tools can measure the running (live) traffic. mtr ? - http://www.bitwizard.nl/mtr/FWIW, Mtr measures latency/delay and loss based on ICMP messages heard
tcptraceroute is handy for looking at what's going on with tcp http://michael.toren.net/code/tcptraceroute/
-- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George RR Martin: A Clash of Kings
Current thread:
- Re: Recommendation of Tools, (continued)
- Re: Recommendation of Tools Craig Holland (Dec 05)
- Re: Recommendation of Tools Brad Fleming (Dec 02)
- Message not available
- Re: Recommendation of Tools Hank Nussbacher (Dec 02)
- RE: Recommendation of Tools Christine Lane (Dec 03)
- Re: Recommendation of Tools Hank Nussbacher (Dec 02)
- Re: Recommendation of Tools Fredy Kuenzler (Dec 03)
- Re: Recommendation of Tools grenville armitage (Dec 03)
- Re: Recommendation of Tools Antonio Querubin (Dec 03)
- Re: Recommendation of Tools Marc Manthey (Dec 03)
- Re: Recommendation of Tools Antonio Querubin (Dec 03)
- Re: Recommendation of Tools Nick Hilliard (Dec 03)
- Re: Recommendation of Tools Andre Gironda (Dec 03)
- Re: Re: Recommendation of Tools aawolfe (Dec 02)
- RE: Recommendation of Tools Skywing (Dec 03)