nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sicily to Egypt undersea cable disruption
From: "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:13:30 -0500
Hi Michael: On Feb 1, 2008 6:44 PM, Michael Painter <tvhawaii () shaka com> wrote:
Here's at least one: http://www.ofcc.com/procedures.htm
Yes, this is the idea. My experience is that fisherman coops, similar to this one for network operators, are contacted during the desk top study "DTS" phase so that the parties can negotiate the best routes insuring that fisheries aren't disrupted or displaced and that the cable finds an agreed upon and effective route around risks that the fisherman have unique views into. There's also public permitting processes that occur and you want harmony. Groups of people angry at your submarine cable is not a good way to start a business and a submarine cable is a business (see "Rod Beck" ;-P ) -M<
Current thread:
- Re: Sicily to Egypt undersea cable disruption, (continued)
- Re: Sicily to Egypt undersea cable disruption Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 01)
- Re: Sicily to Egypt undersea cable disruption Jim Mercer (Feb 01)
- RE: Sicily to Egypt undersea cable disruption andrew2 (Feb 01)
- RE: Sicily to Egypt undersea cable disruption Rod Beck (Feb 01)
- RE: Sicily to Egypt undersea cable disruption Randy Epstein (Feb 01)
- Re: Sicily to Egypt undersea cable disruption George William Herbert (Feb 01)
- Re: Sicily to Egypt undersea cable disruption Roland Dobbins (Feb 01)
- Re: Sicily to Egypt undersea cable disruption Sean Donelan (Feb 02)
- Re: Sicily to Egypt undersea cable disruption Mike Lewinski (Feb 01)
- Re: Sicily to Egypt undersea cable disruption Michael Painter (Feb 01)
- Re: Sicily to Egypt undersea cable disruption Martin Hannigan (Feb 01)