nanog mailing list archives
Re: What is being 'ON NET' good for these days?
From: "William Herrin" <herrin-nanog () dirtside com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:50:26 -0500
On Feb 18, 2008 8:00 AM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver () thenap com> wrote:
We are currently ON NET with 3 major international telecommunication companies
Drew, "On Net" is like "Tier 1." It has devolved into marketspeak that doesn't mean very much. In your case it seems to mean that you can connect with that particular carrier without first purchasing an ILEC local loop. This is mildly helpful, but only mildly. What it sounds like you're looking for is a "carrier neutral" data center where you can connect with multiple providers and peers. The Equinixes and Switch and Datas of the world fill this niche. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us 3005 Crane Dr. Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
Current thread:
- What is being 'ON NET' good for these days? Drew Weaver (Feb 18)
- Re: What is being 'ON NET' good for these days? William Herrin (Feb 18)
- Re: What is being 'ON NET' good for these days? Jon Lewis (Feb 18)
- RE: What is being 'ON NET' good for these days? Rod Beck (Feb 18)
- RE: What is being 'ON NET' good for these days? Rod Beck (Feb 18)
- Re: What is being 'ON NET' good for these days? Jon Lewis (Feb 18)
- Re: What is being 'ON NET' good for these days? William Herrin (Feb 18)