nanog mailing list archives

RE: YouTube IP Hijacking


From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:38:29 -0800


Not if only trusted peers are allowed to advertise to that AS. It's the
same mechanism proposed for blackholing on destination to dampen DOS a
while back, except it is to prevent hijacking, and therefore doesn't run
afoul of the AT&T patent (and now the prior art for this is in the
public domain).

It's also something that can be built using the existing infrastructure,
and rough consensus.


-----Original Message-----
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen () delong com] 
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 8:25 PM
To: Tomas L. Byrnes
Cc: Simon Lockhart; Michael Smith; neil.fenemor () fx net nz; 
will () harg net; nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: YouTube IP Hijacking


On Feb 24, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:


I figured as much, but it was worth a try.

Which touches on the earlier discussion of the null routing of /32s 
advertised by a special AS (as a means of black-holing DDOS 
traffic).

It seems to me that a more immediately germane matter regarding BGP 
route propagation is prevention of hijacking of critical routes.

Perhaps certain ASes that are considered "high priority", 
like Google, 
YouTube, Yahoo, MS (at least their update servers), can be 
trusted to 
propagate routes that are not aggregated/filtered, so as to 
give them 
control over their reachability and immunity to longer-prefix 
hijacking (especially problematic with things like MS update sites).


That's just inviting the injection of forged AS routes to 
commit abuse.

Owen


-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Lockhart [mailto:simon () slimey org]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 2:07 PM
To: Tomas L. Byrnes
Cc: Michael Smith; neil.fenemor () fx net nz; will () harg net; 
nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: YouTube IP Hijacking

On Sun Feb 24, 2008 at 01:49:00PM -0800, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
Which means that, by advertising routes more specific 
than the ones 
they are poisoning, it may well be possible to restore universal 
connectivity to YouTube.

Well, if you can get them in there.... Youtube tried that, 
to restore 
service to the rest of the world, and the announcements didn't 
propogate.

Simon





Current thread: