nanog mailing list archives
Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:54:04 -0800
-------- morrowc.lists () gmail com wrote: ----------- From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com> I think this goes back to my point about DHCP, today there is a business practice and set of business requirements that work for a host of reasons. Expecting that in v6 these requirements will evaporate is not wise. There will have to be some useful TE knobs, I think the operations community would probably like to see those knobs NOT be 'deaggragate' so what other options are there for someone with a single prefix (especially when that prefix is very large). ----------------------------------------------------- I just want to echo agreement with Chris' repeated comments (but seemingly unanswered as of yet) on these issues. scott
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations), (continued)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) Donald Stahl (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) See www.internetassociatesllc.com John L Lee (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) See www.internetassociatesllc.com Martin Hannigan (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) See www.internetassociatesllc.com John L Lee (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) See www.internetassociatesllc.com Martin Hannigan (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) See www.internetassociatesllc.com John L Lee (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) Scott Francis (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) Deepak Jain (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) Scott Francis (Jan 04)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Deepak Jain (Jan 02)