nanog mailing list archives
Re: v6 gluelessness
From: Matt Larson <mlarson () verisign com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:48:35 -0500
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Randy Bush wrote:
I don't know what the process is for getting IPv6 addresses associated with host records in the VGRS COM/NET registry, but it seems like good information to share here if you find a definitive answer.i will. i am trying to document ops processes for v6 in my feeble way, doing it in a blog-like fashion. e.g. for the sage of doing it at one small set of servers see <http://rip.psg.com/~randy/ipv6-westin.html>. more clues would be appreciated. i am hoping all this will seem trite and passe in six months or so. but if we can not find a way to get AAAA glue added to gTLDs such as the com zone, we have a *serious* impediment to v6 deployment that needs to be fixed quickly.
The .com/.net registry has supported AAAA RRs for over five years (since May, 2002). The issue you may be encountering is that not every .com/.net registrar supports them. Matt
Current thread:
- v6 gluelessness Randy Bush (Jan 17)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Jeroen Massar (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Randy Bush (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Joe Abley (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Randy Bush (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Lucy Lynch (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Randy Bush (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Matt Larson (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Randy Bush (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Joe Abley (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Randy Bush (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness David Conrad (Jan 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: v6 gluelessness Andreas Ott (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Randy Bush (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Leo Bicknell (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Jeroen Massar (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness David Conrad (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Randy Bush (Jan 18)
- Re: v6 gluelessness David Conrad (Jan 18)