nanog mailing list archives
Re: Software router state of the art
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:34:19 +0200
* William Herrin:
The Endace DAG cards claim they can move 7 gbps over a PCI-X bus from the NIC to main DRAM. They claim a full 10gbps on a PCIE bus.
But they are receive-only, right? The main problem for "software routing" seems to be that it's basically Ethernet-only because other interfaces are very difficult to find.
Current thread:
- Re: https, (continued)
- Re: https Patrick Giagnocavo (Jul 31)
- Re: https (was: Re: Exploit for DNS Cache Poisoning - RELEASED) Jasper Bryant-Greene (Jul 24)
- Re: https (was: Re: Exploit for DNS Cache Poisoning - RELEASED) William Pitcock (Jul 24)
- Re: https (was: Re: Exploit for DNS Cache Poisoning - RELEASED) Chris Adams (Jul 24)
- Re: https Ken A (Jul 24)
- Re: Exploit for DNS Cache Poisoning - RELEASED Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET (Jul 23)
- Re: Software router state of the art Petri Helenius (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art William Herrin (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art Florian Weimer (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art Petri Helenius (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art Florian Weimer (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art Joel Jaeggli (Jul 23)
- Re: Software router state of the art Chris Adams (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art Seth Mattinen (Jul 26)
- RE: Software router state of the art Darden, Patrick S. (Jul 28)