nanog mailing list archives
RE: Software router state of the art
From: <michael.dillon () bt com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:00:40 +0100
but knowing how bad Linux is at being a router and that their products are Linux-based, I'm afraid to give one a try. J products are based on a competing non-Linux platform that has a better reputation for routing.
Enough with the bipartisan politics. There are more choices than just Linux and FreeBSD for software routing. Click for instance <http://read.cs.ucla.edu/click/> --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: Software router state of the art, (continued)
- Re: Software router state of the art Dorn Hetzel (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art William Herrin (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art Florian Weimer (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art Tony Finch (Jul 27)
- Re: Software router state of the art Joe Greco (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art Sargun Dhillon (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Joe Greco (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Eugeniu Patrascu (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Seth Mattinen (Jul 28)
- RE: Software router state of the art michael.dillon (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Justin Sharp (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Andrew D Kirch (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Charles Wyble (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art David E. Smith (Jul 29)
- Re: Software router state of the art Seth Mattinen (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Charles Wyble (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Joe Greco (Jul 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Software router state of the art Seth Mattinen (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Deepak Jain (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Chris Stebner (Jul 28)