nanog mailing list archives
Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer
From: goemon () anime net
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Robert Boyle wrote:
Let me refine my post then...In our experience, you can't get to line speed with over 20-30ms of latency using TCP on _Windows_ regardless of how much you tweak it. >99% of the servers in our facilities are Windows based. I should have been more specific.
Its actually not that hard on windows. -Dan
Current thread:
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer, (continued)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Kevin Oberman (Jun 12)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Robert E. Seastrom (Jun 13)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Glen Turner (Jun 15)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Robert E. Seastrom (Jun 16)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Kevin Oberman (Jun 12)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Stuart Henderson (Jun 13)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Kevin Oberman (Jun 13)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Robert Boyle (Jun 13)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Deepak Jain (Jun 13)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer goemon (Jun 13)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Glen Turner (Jun 15)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer goemon (Jun 16)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Bob Bradlee (Jun 16)
- Re: Best utilizing fat long pipes and large file transfer Jay R. Ashworth (Jun 22)
- comcast Thompson, Taeko (Jun 12)
- Re: comcast Matt Palmer (Jun 12)