Re: uceprotect.net

["Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com>]

Do you actually have a problem beyond "ZOMG, dnsstuff.com says I am in
uceprotect?".  Its not a list that I personally would waste time with.

BTW, the kind of issue that often affects "cost effective" colo shops
- so-called snowshoe spam - typically HAS matching forward and
reverse.

srs

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver () thenap com> wrote:
>        Hello everyone, this is possibly off-topic here, not entirely sure.
>
>        I'm kind of confused about some of uceprotect's policies, they seem to require every IP address to have 
> reverse DNS with matching forwards (which works fine for a wireless/broadband/dial-up ISP, but not so much for a