nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:08:26 +0200
[Wow, operational content!] On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 05:25:16PM -0500, Chris Owen <owenc () hubris net> wrote a message of 53 lines which said:
At some point what is the difference between putting the mail into a spam folder and sending them to /dev/null?
To me, there is a huge difference. I send no mail to Dave Null, everything goes into a spam folder. Do I read it? Do I review it from time to time? Never. It is too huge. So, what's the point besides bringing money to hard disk manufacturers? It is because, if someone reports (by telephone, IRC or IRL) that he sent an email and I did not receive it, I regard as VERY IMPORTANT to be able to check the spam folder (with a search tool, not by hand) and go back to him saying "No, we really did not receive it". In a professional environment, I would not accept the idea of email disappearing without being able to recover it.
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs, (continued)
- Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs bmanning (Jun 28)
- RE: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs michael.dillon (Jun 28)
- Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs Phil Regnauld (Jun 28)
- RE: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 28)
- Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs Jim Popovitch (Jun 28)
- Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs Jean-François Mezei (Jun 28)
- Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs Chris Owen (Jun 28)
- Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs Randy Bush (Jun 28)
- Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs John Levine (Jun 28)
- Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs John Peach (Jun 29)
- Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jun 29)
- RE: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 29)
- Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs 'Stephane Bortzmeyer' (Jun 29)
- Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs Roland Perry (Jun 30)
- Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Jun 29)
- Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs Rich Kulawiec (Jun 29)
- Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs Jim Shankland (Jun 28)
- Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs Rich Kulawiec (Jun 28)
- Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs Matthew Petach (Jun 28)
- Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs Rich Kulawiec (Jun 28)
- Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs Marshall Eubanks (Jun 28)