nanog mailing list archives
Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack)
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:01:24 +0530
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Glen Kent <glen.kent () gmail com> wrote:
Do ISPs (PTA, AboveNet, etc) that "unintentionally" hijack someone else IP address space, ever get penalized in *any* form? Depending upon whom and what they hijack, and who all get affected, it sure can
PTA's ASN actually did get disconnected for several hours by PCCW (which was leaking the youtube prefixes that PTA announced, and which shut off all of PTA's ASN rather than just filtering out the bogus announcements) Though, I am not too convinced that wasnt simply laziness at PCCW rather than a desire to punish PTA Nobody's blackholed abovenet yet that I know of. And if they did do that, they'd feel the effects real soon. --srs
Current thread:
- Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Glen Kent (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Jeff Aitken (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Larry J. Blunk (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Pekka Savola (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 17)
- Re: Operators Penalized? (was Re: Kenyan Route Hijack) Joe Maimon (Mar 17)