nanog mailing list archives
Re: Customer-facing ACLs
From: Andy Davidson <andy () nosignal org>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:58:30 +0000
On 7 Mar 2008, at 23:57, Scott Weeks wrote:
Might as well do TCP 20, 21 and 23, too. Woah, that slope's getting slippery!
Oh, no, this one again. *** The Internet Is Not The Web. *** Could someone put that onto a t-shirt ?If it becomes normal for home users to only have 80 and 443, then how can I innovate and design something that needs a new protocol ? What happens to the new voice and video services for example ?
On 11 Mar 2008, at 02:33, Christopher Morrow wrote:
vpns fix this...
They stop fixing stuff when they stop working. If you start running vpn services on tcp/80 (yuck, yuck, yuck), and naturally because it's the only port open lots of other non http protocol stuff does too, will filter-happy domestic providers start proxying the web instead of just filtering the rest of the traffic ..?
Andy
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG laptops (was Re: Customer-facing ACLs), (continued)
- Re: NANOG laptops (was Re: Customer-facing ACLs) William Allen Simpson (Mar 09)
- Re: NANOG laptops (was Re: Customer-facing ACLs) Mark Prior (Mar 10)
- Re: NANOG laptops (was Re: Customer-facing ACLs) Bill Woodcock (Mar 09)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Justin Shore (Mar 09)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Adrian Chadd (Mar 08)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Justin Shore (Mar 08)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Chris Marlatt (Mar 10)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Adrian Chadd (Mar 10)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Justin Shore (Mar 10)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Marshall Eubanks (Mar 18)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Jon Lewis (Mar 18)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Adrian Chadd (Mar 18)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Justin Shore (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Adrian Chadd (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Sean Donelan (Mar 10)
- RE: Customer-facing ACLs Frank Bulk - iNAME (Mar 10)