nanog mailing list archives
Re: rack power question
From: "Alexander Harrowell" <a.harrowell () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:29:25 +0000
We'll need non-returns in there as well, to limit the maximum possible spillage. More seriously, the energy-efficiency community has a whole design approach for industrial facilities called "Factor 10 Engineering" which is about saving heat or cooling by using the shortest, straightest, fattest pipes you can at any point. You'd probably want to keep the flexible "water over ethernet" pipes to a minimum; have a pair of bigger risers per rack and tap into those. On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl () asgaard org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Provided the brilliant tech didn't forget to remove the grit from the connector on the pizzabox that then gets in the said valve and wedges it open..... :) Remember folks, someone will always make "brighter" remote hands.... In principal, though, I like it. Chris On 25 Mar 2008, at 06.08, Alexander Harrowell wrote:A valve in the connector; has to be pushed in by the other connector to let the water flow. Water pressure pushes it shut otherwise so it fails-safe. On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband comwrote:That would be pretty good. But seeing some of the disastrous cabling situations it'd have to be made pretty idiot proof. Nice double sealed idiot proof piping with self-sealing ends.. -- Leigh -- Leigh Alexander Harrowell wrote:I still think the industry needs to standardise water cooling topopulariseit; if there were two water ports on all the pizzaboxes next tothe RJ45s,and a standard set of flexible pipes, how many people would startusing it?There's probably a medical, automotive or aerospace standard outthere.On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband comwrote:$5 Adrian Chadd wrote:This thread begs a question - how much do you think it'd beworth to dothings more efficiently? Adrian- --- 李柯睿 Check my PGP key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCB67593B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJH6RboAAoJEGmx2Mt/+Iw/O/UIAIEWSjeRr0mEcUNXoclxefEG 4k7VjzoGLCBKlven62DwKXcFInBsGaaHXQyZH8vIKiraeh9JYFXo5wLotgO4bjYk vV0l7Sd3iLpueDzFLbho3YWAcCh52dmLbZRn31L3/eSoNivagQKBruIy8WQmgJIt 54/KiBIr7PUQXFYqA4kwiWnkOAZ+DfpGcfKY/LRhksGltVFW5N+X8FKSvlIR/ZjK Ka+omSh2ccUNpD5Y6Iwa+KkAYulEnus5i1pzA07rz0YKxkIfXpPnadlMmdFJJiYo wOqwIUVcjQQ2aruANKyXBnkWcTTD228xc06KgLLJToNjVY9XeOeJqQOxF6mNglc= =+lj0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: rack power question, (continued)
- Re: rack power question Duane Waddle (Mar 24)
- Re: rack power question Deepak Jain (Mar 24)
- RE: rack power question Frank Bulk - iNAME (Mar 24)
- Re: rack power question Paul Vixie (Mar 24)
- RE: rack power question michael.dillon (Mar 25)
- Re: rack power question Adrian Chadd (Mar 25)
- Re: rack power question Leigh Porter (Mar 25)
- Re: rack power question Alexander Harrowell (Mar 25)
- Re: rack power question Leigh Porter (Mar 25)
- Re: rack power question Alexander Harrowell (Mar 25)
- Message not available
- Re: rack power question Alexander Harrowell (Mar 25)
- Re: rack power question Dorn Hetzel (Mar 25)
- Re: rack power question Chris Adams (Mar 25)
- RE: rack power question Ryan Otis (Mar 25)
- Re: rack power question Joe Abley (Mar 25)
- Re: rack power question Justin Shore (Mar 25)
- RE: rack power question Ben Butler (Mar 25)
- Re: rack power question Alexander Harrowell (Mar 25)
- RE: rack power question Ray Burkholder (Mar 25)
- RE: rack power question Alex Rubenstein (Mar 25)
- Re: rack power question Brian Raaen (Mar 25)