nanog mailing list archives

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?


From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 17:51:44 -0700

Interestingly, Windows XP, Sp3, released today, describes changes in
PMTUD behavior.

Black Hole Router detection is now on by default:

http://download.microsoft.com/download/6/8/7/687484ed-8174-496d-8db9-f02
b40c12982/Overview%20of%20Windows%20XP%20Service%20Pack%203.pdf
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Bonomi [mailto:bonomi () mail r-bonomi com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 3:54 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

`

Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 14:29:03 -0700
From: Nathan Anderson/FSR <nathana () fsr com>
Subject: Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?


Now, although that makes sense, in order to avoid issues 
like the one 
we are facing with Microsoft, would it not make _more_ 
sense for the 
stack to look at the PMTU cache first, and then adjust its own MSS 
just for connections to that one host?

This _is_ Microsoft we're talking about, remember.  'sense' 
and 'Microsoft'
are, at a =minimum= orthogonal to each other -- and may not 
even inhabit the same address-space. <wry grin>

As for standards, it is official Microsoft policy to "embrace 
and extend",
not to implement in a way compatible with the rest of the 
world.   *sigh*

I -don't- believe the rumor that "PMTUD/Vista Ultimate" sends 
incrementally increasing-size packets, and uses the first one 
that -doesn't- get through
as the size limit.     <giggle>



_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG () nanog org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog


_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG () nanog org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog


Current thread: