nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] Questions about NETCONF
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:22:20 +0200
I've personally been waiting for the data modeling to be standardized. Yes, it's great and wonderful to have a consistent method of talking to network devices, but I also want a standard data model along with it.
does this not imply that all devices would need to be semantically congruent? if so, is this realistic? randy _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG () nanog org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Current thread:
- [NANOG] BCP Muni WiFI? Deepak Jain (May 15)
- Re: [NANOG] BCP Muni WiFI? Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 15)
- [NANOG] Questions about NETCONF 袁智辉 (May 15)
- Re: [NANOG] Questions about NETCONF John Payne (May 16)
- Re: [NANOG] Questions about NETCONF Randy Bush (May 16)
- Re: [NANOG] Questions about NETCONF Simon Leinen (May 16)
- Re: [NANOG] Questions about NETCONF John Payne (May 16)
- Re: [NANOG] BCP Muni WiFI? Paul Wall (May 16)
- Re: [NANOG] BCP Muni WiFI? Christopher LILJENSTOLPE (May 16)
- Re: [NANOG] BCP Muni WiFI? Jay R. Ashworth (May 16)
- Re: [NANOG] BCP Muni WiFI? Christopher LILJENSTOLPE (May 16)
- Re: [NANOG] BCP Muni WiFI? Joel Jaeggli (May 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [NANOG] BCP Muni WiFI? charles (May 16)
- Re: [NANOG] BCP Muni WiFI? Marshall Eubanks (May 16)