nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?
From: Pete Templin <petelists () templin org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:32:30 -0500
Tony Varriale wrote:
Thanks for the info. We needed larger than /22 anyways.I am a bit surprised that they will hand out a small allocaiton for multihomers. These days it's very easy to do. And, could be a easy way to horde some v4.
Nope, you can horde a /24 for a single device, but it's provider-assigned. If you can't justify a /23 -now-, you don't qualify for an ARIN multihomers' /22.
pt
Current thread:
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?, (continued)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Tony Varriale (May 20)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Nathan Ward (May 20)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Andy Dills (May 20)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Tony Varriale (May 21)
- Re: Renumbering, was: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Deepak Jain (May 21)
- Re: Renumbering, was: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? David Coulson (May 21)
- Re: Renumbering, was: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Jack Bates (May 21)
- Re: Renumbering, was: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? David Coulson (May 21)
- Re: Renumbering, was: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Deepak Jain (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Tony Varriale (May 20)
- RE: Renumbering, was: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? McMasters, Jeremy (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Pete Templin (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Tony Varriale (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Robert E. Seastrom (May 21)
- RE: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? William Mullaney (May 21)
- Hughes Network Joe Blanchard (May 22)
- RE: Hughes Network rar (May 22)
- RE: Hughes Network Jason J. W. Williams (May 22)
- Re: Hughes Network Michael Holstein (May 22)
- Re: Hughes Network Jim Popovitch (May 22)
- RE: Hughes Network Jason J. W. Williams (May 22)
- RE: Hughes Network Jason J. W. Williams (May 22)