nanog mailing list archives
Re: amazonaws.com?
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 14:41:03 -0400
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:01:30PM -0500, Skywing wrote:
That's somewhat ironic of a sentiment you referred to there, given that the conception that one should have to hand over one's SSN for "verification" to anyone who asks for it is the kind of thing that many of these spammers/phishers thrive on in the first place...
What... are people still using SSNs as authenticators instead of identifiers, 20 years on? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra () baylink com Designer +-Internetworking------+---------+ RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates | Best Practices Wiki | | '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA +-http://bestpractices.wikia.com-+ +1 727 647 1274 If you can read this... thank a system administrator. Or two. --me
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG NYC Event, (continued)
- Re: NANOG NYC Event J. Oquendo (May 31)
- Re: NANOG NYC Event Scott Brim (May 31)
- Re: NANOG NYC Event andrew young (May 31)
- Re: NANOG NYC Event Scott Brim (May 31)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Joe Loiacono (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Al Iverson (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Barry Shein (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Brandon Galbraith (May 28)
- RE: amazonaws.com? michael.dillon (May 28)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Jay R. Ashworth (May 28)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Joe Abley (May 28)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Martin Hannigan (May 28)