nanog mailing list archives

RE: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts


From: <michael.dillon () bt com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:54:30 -0000

Put another way, since _every_ network does this, if you do 
not want to buy from 'such networks', you cannot buy transit.

Let's put it another 'nother way.
Would an end user get better connectivity by buying from a 
reseller of transit? In other words, buying transit from
a network which also buys transit. Presumably up near the
top of the chain (Tier 1 vicinity), that transit reseller
has a lot of peering in place with other folks in the same
neighborhood (Tier 1 vicinity). But as long as a network
is a transit reseller (i.e. they buy transit), then they
are less likely to suffer from partition events caused
by fractious peering negotiations.

--Michael Dillon

frac*tious (frakshus)
adj.
1. Inclined to make trouble; unruly.
2. Having a peevish nature; cranky.

Also likely to cause your network having connectivity
to only a fraction of the Internet.


Current thread: