nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Wow
From: Alain Durand <alain_durand () cable comcast com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:46:05 -0400
On 10/23/08 6:39 PM, "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf () tndh net> wrote:
A properly implemented client will do the longest prefix match against that set, so a 6to4 client will go directly to the content provider's 6to4 router, while a native client will take the direct path.
Not quite. Say the server has native IPv6 address 2001::1 and 6to4 IPv6 2002::X. Say the client has native IPv6 address 2003::1 and 6to4 IPv6 2002::Y. Longest prefix match will choose 6to4 over native IPv6. Not good. - Alain.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Wow, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Wow William Pitcock (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Stephen Sprunk (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Daniel Senie (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 12)
- RE: IPv6 Wow Tony Hain (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Alain Durand (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Mark Andrews (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Joe Abley (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Perry Lorier (Oct 23)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow William Pitcock (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Carlos Friacas (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Nathan Ward (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Wow David Malone (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Kevin Day (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Wow Mohacsi Janos (Oct 13)