nanog mailing list archives
RE: Peering - Benefits?
From: <michael.dillon () bt com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:06:59 -0000
On 30 Oct 2008, at 13:03, HRH Sven Olaf Prinz von CyberBunker-Kamphuis MP wrote:internet exchanges are not per-se "redundant"Those networks who *choose* connect to peers via a single fabric, in a single location, will suffer a similar fate to those networks who single home to one transit provider.
Are you referring to his royal highness' network? <http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS34109&v=4&view=2.0> In any case, if you are really interested in achieving highly reliable connectivity to the Internet, you need to start by engineering it into your design. It's not just a matter of choosing the right mix of peering and transit. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliable_system_design> --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- RE: Peering - Benefits?, (continued)
- RE: Peering - Benefits? Paul Stewart (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering - Benefits? Steven King (Oct 29)
- RE: Peering - Benefits? Paul Stewart (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering - Benefits? Steven King (Oct 29)
- Re: Peering - Benefits? Adam Armstrong (Oct 30)
- RE: Peering - Benefits? Paul Stewart (Oct 29)
- RE: Peering - Benefits? HRH Sven Olaf Prinz von CyberBunker-Kamphuis MP (Oct 30)
- RE: Peering - Benefits? Paul Stewart (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering - Benefits? Will Hargrave (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering - Benefits? Will Hargrave (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering - Benefits? Andy Davidson (Oct 30)
- RE: Peering - Benefits? michael.dillon (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering - Benefits? Miquel van Smoorenburg (Oct 31)
- Re: Peering - Benefits? Adam Armstrong (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering - Benefits? Pierfrancesco Caci (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering - Benefits? Todd Underwood (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering - Benefits? Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 30)
- RE: Peering - Benefits? Paul Stewart (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering - Benefits? Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 30)
- RE: Peering - Benefits? Paul Stewart (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering - Benefits? Matthew Moyle-Croft (Oct 30)