nanog mailing list archives
Re: ingress SMTP
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:51:18 +0100
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Well, that depends on MUA design, of course, but it's just been pointed out to me that the RFC says MAY, not MUST.
Note that there are TWO relevant RFCs: RFC 4409 and RFC 5068. The latter says: 3.1. Best Practices for Submission Operation Submission Authentication: MSAs MUST perform authentication on the identity asserted during all mail transactions on the SUBMISSION port, even for a message having a RCPT TO address that would not cause the message to be relayed outside of the local administrative domain. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ FISHER GERMAN BIGHT: SOUTHWESTERLY 5 TO 7, OCCASIONALLY GALE 8 IN GERMAN BIGHT, DECREASING 4 AT TIMES. ROUGH OR VERY ROUGH, BECOMING MODERATE LATER. SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD.
Current thread:
- Re: ingress SMTP, (continued)
- Re: ingress SMTP Justin Scott (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Alec Berry (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Justin Scott (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Alan Hodgson (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Michael Thomas (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Nicholas Suan (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Tony Finch (Sep 04)
- Re: ingress SMTP David Champion (Sep 04)
- Re: ingress SMTP Joel Jaeggli (Sep 10)
- Re: ingress SMTP Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 11)
- Re: ingress SMTP Bill Stewart (Sep 12)
- Re: ingress SMTP Mark Foster (Sep 12)
- Re: ingress SMTP Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 12)
- RE: ingress SMTP Frank Bulk (Sep 13)
- Re: ingress SMTP Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 13)
- Re: ingress SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 13)
- RE: ingress SMTP Frank Bulk (Sep 13)
- Re: ingress SMTP Alec Berry (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Justin Scott (Sep 03)