nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco uRPF failures
From: Saku Ytti <saku+nanog () ytti fi>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:11:28 +0300
On (2008-09-11 00:50 -0700), Jo Rhett wrote:
As someone who does a lot of work talking to NOCs trying to chase down attack sources, I can honestly tell you that I haven't talked to a single NOC in the last 16 months who had BCP38 on every port, or even on most of their ports. And the majority response is "our (vendor) gear can't handle it". As we both know, Cisco is the largest by far vendor in the marketplace, and I've heard that name more than 70% of the time.
Sound like these shops are using 3550 as router, which is common for smaller shops, especially in EU. And indeed, 3550 would not do uRPF. (3560E does). -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- RE: Force10 Gear - Opinions, (continued)
- RE: Force10 Gear - Opinions James Jun (Sep 03)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Jo Rhett (Sep 03)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Sep 03)
- Cisco uRPF failures Jo Rhett (Sep 04)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Anton Kapela (Sep 06)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Christopher Morrow (Sep 06)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Sam Stickland (Sep 07)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Saku Ytti (Sep 11)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Jo Rhett (Sep 11)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Brandon Ewing (Sep 13)
- Re: Cisco uRPF failures Saku Ytti (Sep 13)
- RE: Cisco uRPF failures Tom Zingale (tomz) (Sep 15)
- RE: Force10 Gear - Opinions James Jun (Sep 03)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Brian Feeny (Sep 03)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Paul Wall (Sep 04)
- Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions Mark Tinka (Sep 04)
- uRPF Jo Rhett (Sep 04)
- Re: uRPF Mark Tinka (Sep 04)