nanog mailing list archives
self-promotion [was: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or potential exploit?]
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 21:40:38 -0400
On Sep 2, 2008, at 6:44 PM, Paul Wall wrote:
Could you please take the self-promotion offline already? Enough is enough! I don't think anybody on this list is interested in hiring you or reviewing your resume! (It could be argued that my post is off-topic as well. I disagree. Furthermore, it had to be done, given the lack of public face or consistent enforcement action of the current MLC.)
[...]
Paul Wall http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulwall On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:My profile and resume: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gadievron
[SNIP]Just so that I am clear on your issue here: You believe it is "okay" for you to put your linkedin URL in your .sig, but Gadi must not be allowed to put it at the top of a post? I ask because I had to go back and read what you were so upset over since I did not even notice the first line in his post. I bet many others did not as well.
Oh, and I think the fact it is L-Root's old IP address probably means no one will hire him to research it anyway. :-)
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or potential exploit? Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Sep 02)
- Re: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or potential exploit? Gadi Evron (Sep 02)
- Re: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or potential exploit? Paul Wall (Sep 02)
- self-promotion [was: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or potential exploit?] Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 02)
- Re: self-promotion [was: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or potential exploit?] Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 02)
- Re: self-promotion [was: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or potential exploit?] Gadi Evron (Sep 02)
- Re: self-promotion [was: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or Joe Greco (Sep 03)
- Re: self-promotion [was: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 03)
- Re: self-promotion [was: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or Lamar Owen (Sep 03)
- Re: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or potential exploit? Paul Wall (Sep 02)
- Re: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or potential exploit? Gadi Evron (Sep 02)
- Re: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or potential exploit? micky coughes (Sep 02)
- Re: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or potential exploit? Gadi Evron (Sep 02)