nanog mailing list archives
Re: ingress SMTP
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 21:20:31 +0530
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:46 PM, *Hobbit* <hobbit () avian org> wrote:
What I'm trying to get a feel for is this: what proportion of edge customers have a genuine NEED to send direct SMTP traffic to TCP 25 at arbitrary destinations? I'm thinking mostly of cable-modem and
Not too many - they got themselves port 587 to submit outbound mail. Read the maawg managing port 25 document - and while you are at it read the walled garden doc too.. port 25 abuse is the least of your worries with cable/dsl cpe swamps http://www.maawg.org/port25 http://www.maawg.org/about/whitepapers/MAAWG_Walled_Garden_BP_2007-09.pdf --srs
Current thread:
- ingress SMTP *Hobbit* (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Winders, Timothy A (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Alec Berry (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Winders, Timothy A (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Jason Fesler (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Winders, Timothy A (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Winders, Timothy A (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Jean-François Mezei (Sep 04)
- Re: ingress SMTP Tony Finch (Sep 04)
- Re: ingress SMTP Winders, Timothy A (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Tony Finch (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Eugeniu Patrascu (Sep 07)