nanog mailing list archives
comparison of hijack alert systems [was]: prefix hijack by ASN 8997
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:08:46 -0700
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Scott Weeks wrote:
I am hoping to confirm a short-duration prefix hijack
<snip> --- hank () efes iucc ac il wrote: From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il> I too spotted this via PHAS for a large number of prefixes, but have not received alerts from IAR, Watchmy.Net nor does RIPE RIS show this hijack: http://www.ris.ripe.net/perl-risapp/risearch.html I would have expected with so many RRC boxes that RIPE RIS would have caught it. I had thought it was a false positive from PHAS but now that you and others have seen it - I guess it is for real. ---------------------------------------- It'd be very interesting to compare said systems using this event. I have not subscribed to MyASN or watchmy.net yet, so I can't do that. I do note, however, that PHAS took 4 hours and 20 minutes to email me, which is within the specs noted on their site. scott
Current thread:
- comparison of hijack alert systems [was]: prefix hijack by ASN 8997 Scott Weeks (Sep 23)