nanog mailing list archives

Re: ingress SMTP


From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 12:06:44 -0400

On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:52:48AM -0400, Tim Sanderson wrote:
Anybody not wanting to use their ISP email would notice it. I see
filtering 25 FROM the customer as something that is not likely to
happen because of this. When a customer buys bandwidth, they want to
be able to use it for whatever they choose. This would be just one
more restriction giving competitive advantage to any ISP not doing the
filtering.

Just as long as consumer ISPs don't start filtering *110* inbound from
the net... as AT&T used to.  I had a client move from dialup to
cablemodem about 10 years ago... and it took us a *week* to get AT&T to
admit they didn't accept inbound POP pickups.  Client (intemperately) had
printed the att.com email address of lots of crap -- they had to keep the
dialup for a long time, since at&t wouldn't forward either...

Thank ghod I'm out of the jungle now...

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                   Baylink                      jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com                     '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA      http://photo.imageinc.us             +1 727 647 1274

             Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
             Those who count the vote decide everything.
               -- (Josef Stalin)


Current thread: